homebrew
Home
Page Title

irish moss vs protafloc

Irish moss vs Protafloc

Objective: to test the effectiveness of Irish moss against a more modern kettle fining agent.

The experiment:

100g Dried malt extract
1000ml water
1g protafloc from brupaks
1g Irish moss coarse grind, Unbranded

Two worts were produced using the malt extract and water.
Both were boiled in separate pans for 15 minutes.
The finings were re-hydrated in warm water for 10 minutes
1g of Protafloc was added to pan #1 and 1g of Irish moss to pan #2
The boil was continued for a further 10 minutes.
Both samples were cooled to approximately 9°C using Ice
Samples were decanted into pint glasses

dscf0057.jpg

dscf0044.jpg

12hrspint.jpg

36hrs.jpg

Enter secondary content here

Observations

The wort with added protafloc clearly looked different at the end of the boil. After cooling, medium flocks of coagulated protein were visible. The wort containing Irish moss looked cloudy like dirty dish water.
The two worts were decanted into pint glasses and left to stand. Initially the difference between the two worts was subtle, clearing was slow and a full 6 hours was needed before one sample showed a positive break. Clearing continued over the next few days. The protofloc sample showed a crystal clear wort above the trub. Interestingly the Irish moss sample deposited a heavier layer of trub yet failed to clear.

Summary

Malt extract will give different results to a full mash and the boil times employed this experiment are short. During an average mash and 90min boil more protein matter will form and coagulate. The results however should still show up the differences between the two finings.

This experiment only looks at one aspect of brewing. wort clarity, i dont know what effects would occur futher down the line at this stage.

dscf0041.jpg

break.jpg

brew19eob.jpg

brew19eob2.jpg

This is protafloc working at its best, the crappy sludge in the bottom realy gums up the manifold

dscf0142.jpg

dscf0140.jpg